Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Blake Griffin Slam Dunks: NBA Jam Style

Why Josh Barnett Should Never Be Licensed to Fight Again

Josh_20barnett_medium

via www.onzuka.com

As someone that was deeply affected by the financial crisis of September 2008, it's difficult for me to be objective when it comes to employment. While others are more than happy to call for the dismissal of athletes in each and every sport, there's a large part of me that's deeply uncomfortable with rooting for someone to lose their job. Certainly, performance has to matter, and the UFC prides itself on being home to the best mixed martial artists the planet has to offer - still, however, you'll rarely catch me complaining about a fighter giving another opportunity to make as much money as he or she can within their short athletic window for doing so.

Unless, of course, that fighter is named Josh Barnett.

Barnett is a unique situation in MMA - in all of sports, actually.  An undeniably talented grappler, Barnett quickly rose through the heavyweight ranks, culminating in an upset "victory" over Randy Couture at UFC 36 that made him the youngest UFC HW champion in history.  Victory is in quotation marks, of course, because following the bout, Barnett's urine sample tested positive for three separate banned substances, and he was subsequently stripped of the title - the win, however, remains on Barnett's resume, as does Couture's loss in that bout, for a reason that no one has ever satisfactorily explained to me.  The NSAC's failure to properly adjust the record books in this case is even more puzzling when one realizes that Barnett had already been caught by the NSAC for using steroids, but the commission did not have a punitive policy in place for such violations at the time.

Following Barnett's first publicized positive steroid test (second overall), he absconded to Japan, taking a couple of smaller bouts before moving up to PRIDE for the duration of that promotion's existence.  Now, since PRIDE simultaneously wasn't overseen by an athletic commission and didn't really give a damn about the safety of its fighters, we don't know what was coursing through Barnett's veins - or, to be fair, that of his opponents - but what we do know is that he went 0-3 against Cro Cop, lost his rematch with Nogueira on NYE 2006 (Barnett's most recent and possibly final bout against a top ten heavyweight) and passed an NSAC drug test to be licensed for PRIDE's short-lived USA jaunt.  Ironically, in Barnett's first officially sanctioned MMA bout in four years, it was his opponent - the immortal Pawel Nastula - that popped for steroids.

PRIDE's death left Barnett without a world class employer, and he signed a non-exclusive contract with World Victory Road.  When it became clear that neither he nor PRIDE champion Fedor Emelianenko would be going to the UFC (and that UFC champion Randy Couture would be returning to the organization after attempting to retire/leave), Affliction CEO Tom Atencio decided to incorporate Barnett into his three-card monty and planned to have the two fight in his promotion's final event.  Barnett held up his end of the bargain, avenging a previous KO loss to Pedro Rizzo at Affliction: Banned and TKOing Gilbert Yvel at the second event (which, originally, was headlined by a possible Barnett fight against Andre Arlovski; Andre instead had his soul stolen by Fedor at the top of that card).  Everything seemed set for Affliction: Trilogy, arguably the most anticipated card of 2009 (after UFC 100), to give Fedor/Barnett to those that had salivated over it for years.

That, of course, didn't happen.

After the jump, Barnett's third strike - and why it should render him incapable of competing in sanctioned mixed martial arts bouts for the duration of his career.

Star-divide

On July 24, 2009 - a mere ten days before Affliction's scheduled card in Anaheim - the California State Athletic Commission announced that Josh Barnett had been suspended due to a positive test.  The CSAC took it upon themselves to require Barnett to pass a drug test weeks before the fight in an attempt to catch him before he had a chance to cycle off any illegal substances before the bout took place.  While Barnett (per usual) vehemently denied the charges, his "B" urine sample confirmed the positive test for a metabolite of Drostanalone, a designer anabolic steroid.  Affliction, unable to secure a replacement opponent for Fedor on such short notice, threw up its hands, cancelled the entire card and agreed to come back to the UFC as a clothing sponsor.

This is what Barnett prevented from happening.

Main card


Undercard


Non Televised Bouts (M-1 Global Bouts)


Pretty sweet card, right?  Damn shame it didn't happen, and Barnett's inability to pass a drug test ended up costing over 20 fighters a decent payday following a long, hard training camp.

Baseball has caught a world of grief from the media for turning a blind eye toward PED usage during the 1990's.  While decades-old home run records were being destroyed by multiple people on a yearly basis and a previously svelte Pittsburgh Pirate was ballooning into a cartoonish San Francisco Giant, Bud Selig and company were happy to entertain a public jaded by a cancelled World Series without asking a lot of questions.  At an incredibly sluggish pace - and only at the behest of public prodding - MLB eventually instituted a drug testing policy and punishment rubric that goes like this:

1st positive test: 50 game suspension (approximately two months, but only during competition)
2nd positive test: 100 game suspension (approximately four months, but only during competition)
3rd positive test: Lifetime ban.  

Do not pass Go, do not collect $200.  No pension, no HoF, nada, zip, zero, zilch.  Gone.  Done.  Excommunicated.  Banished.  Banned.  Pete Rose-style.

If Major League Baseball is treating PED usage more seriously than a sport that involves people beating the living hell out of each other, what does that say about our priorities?

Texas' athletic commission has previously gone out of its way to award Antonio Margarito a license despite his issues with the CSAC.  I wrote in January about how Scott Coker was jeopardizing the legitimacy of AC suspensions by commission shopping for Barnett, and I feel the same way to day - if the dozens of disparate state organizations in the US don't honor each other's disciplinary edicts, then the entire system crumbles due to lack of efficacy.  I don't want to see that happen.  This is why I hope that Josh Barnett's status as an unlicensed MMA fighter - confirmed yesterday - continues as it is.  Unless and until he straightens things out in California, Josh Barnett should not be licensed to fight in the United States again, for any promotion, by any self-respecting athletic commission.

This sport doesn't need a three-time cheat.  No sport does.

 

SBN coverage of Strikeforce: Overeem vs. Werdum

Poll
Should Josh Barnett be licensed to fight?
Yes
136 votes
No
37 votes
Hell No
86 votes

259 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 22 comments  |  3 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Thanks man

That card was going to be fucking amazing.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Editor, HeadKickLegend.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Jun 9, 2011 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

But wait...

Fedor was fighting in that card….and that wasn’t a UFC promoted event! Are you sure this is the promotional biased douche that writes for BE!?

Haha, jp, but good stuff. Im a fan of Barnett but 3 times is excessive.

And I most definitely agree that after your third time, you should be banned from competing in any sport involving another human being.

Also, i thought you were a little short with some statements. Such as him going “0-3” against Mirko (2 of those losses were anything but conclusive, one being by form of freak injury and the other was when Barnett was coming off a war with Minotauro and had visible damage to his eye socket before his 3rd fight with CC), as well as:

Victory is in quotation marks, of course, because following the bout, Barnett’s urine sample tested positive for three separate banned substances, and he was subsequently stripped of the title – the win, however, remains on Barnett’s resume, as does Couture’s loss in that bout, for a reason that no one has ever satisfactorily explained to me

perhaps you should do a little more digging into that and you will see guys like Marquardt, Leben, Royce, and Sylvia all tested positive for banned substances as well but none of their decision were overturned either.

The character of a man is always proven after faillure - not after success.

by Chorongota on Jun 9, 2011 7:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

For the record

I bought both Affliction PPV’s and was looking forward to their third. However you want to say it, Mirko Cro Cop is 3-0 against Josh Barnett (and flat-out shit kicked Josh in the fight you don’t mention). I think it’s bullshit that anyone gets to keep a win on their record after testing positive – Barnett’s just an incredibly old and egregious example.

I’m glad you liked the piece.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Editor, HeadKickLegend.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Jun 9, 2011 7:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Changing "W" to "L".

Call me crazy, but a “No Contest” isn’t taking things far enough for steroids. Most fighters don’t care about the “NC” since it doesn’t damage their win-loss ratio for that fight. In my opinion, guys like Barnett should’ve gotten their “Wins” flipped to “Losses” in order to promote a new level of severity for violating PEDs.

Not only is the fight ban a damaging loss of income, but the extra “L” on the fight record is just as damaging a blow.

Affliction’s Anaheim PPV was going to be one of the first ones I bought outside my usual UFC schedule. That was damn good card, but Barnett had to be Barnett. It’s like rolling a “0” in Roulette — everybody fucking loses.

Staff Editor at GamePro
Follow Me: @KenTheGreat1
I Interviewed Dana White Once & It Was Totally Cool

by McKinley B. Noble on Jun 11, 2011 4:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

And yes, I'm aware Barnett doesn't have an "NC" on his record.

But I’m referring to whole groups of fighters who shrug off the “NC” like it’s no big deal. (Except Nick Diaz — let the man smoke.) In Barnett’s case, he should be 28-6, not 29-5.

Staff Editor at GamePro
Follow Me: @KenTheGreat1
I Interviewed Dana White Once & It Was Totally Cool

by McKinley B. Noble on Jun 11, 2011 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

1st strike: Popped for steroids after Randy fight
2nd strike: Popped for steroids before Fedor fight
What’s the third again? The one upcoming?

He is unlicensed by California right now, no disciplinary action is currently being enforced. His suspension is finished and he has not officially completed the re-licensing process as he failed to finish his appearance before the board. I fail to see under what grounds Texas would prevent hims from getting a license there if they think he is not a risk to do it again (another debate, I won’t argue that he isn’t)

by blawa on Jun 9, 2011 4:38 PM EDT reply actions  

Read the January piece – the only reason he’s not suspended is because he didn’t show up to his disciplinary hearing. No, he tested positive BEFORE the Randy fight, but the NSAC was brand spanking new and didn’t have any kind of punishment in its rules, so Barnett got a free pass on his first one.

Texas shouldn’t be licensing anyone that isn’t squared away with the other commissions.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Editor, HeadKickLegend.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Jun 9, 2011 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ok, cheaters should be banned for sure. And yes, that would of been a tremendous card.

That said, I say legalize steroids. If an adult makes the decision to potentially harm himself, so be it. Let’s see some monsters full of roid rage in the cage! In addition, I say MLB should allow aluminum bats and the pitcher can wear a helmut and while you’re at it lower the pitcher’s mound. Who wouldn’t like to see a 35-30 baseball game. Eliminate offsides in soccer and widen the goal—15-14 would make that snoozefest interesting. Take away a defensive back in football! You see, I’m all about the fan experience.

by Fedornuthugger on Jun 9, 2011 4:46 PM EDT reply actions  

Off topic but along the same line. Why does the ref in MMA get between opponents when one is going to stand up?

Shouldn’t the standing fighter be able to “trick” the downed opponent into thinking he is going to let him up and then jump on him? I mean as long as he doesn’t punt the downed oppenent….

by Fedornuthugger on Jun 9, 2011 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fantastic Article Subo

The guy has had a few chances to clean up his act, file for a license, etc etc… And he just finds a way to fuck everyone over somehow. He should be stuck to doing gimmick wrestling matches. I want to like the guy, and I bet to those that really know him, he’s a nice guy and all. But come on, quit being immature and get your shit straight

Twitter = tpears86

by MMA42 on Jun 9, 2011 4:57 PM EDT reply actions  

he was never suspended in 2009.the test was a requirement for him to get a license, but it never resulted in a suspension.

by Deathexplosion on Jun 9, 2011 6:05 PM EDT reply actions  

This story was retweeted by a fashion thing because it included the word “Couture”.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Editor, HeadKickLegend.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Jun 9, 2011 9:37 PM EDT reply actions  

Everyones on juice you fool! Barnett is a good fighter I don’t care about any tests I like him and wanna watch him fight. Plus we don’t have alot of good heavyweights so just enjoy his slaughter of Rogers.

by randallhumphries on Jun 9, 2011 11:17 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Came here top say the same thing

It is ridiculous how we try to pretend only the guys who get caught are juicing. We are just playing dumb.
He juiced as his opponents did, but he was caught, then he is bashed for years long.

And also there is no point in putting some much blame for Afflictions folding on his shoulders. How many times have the UFC lost one of its main event fighters (in some cases both) and still the show went on? If Affliction is not competent enough to find a replacement for Barnett or even a replacement for the Fedor fight than it is their fault they folded.

by mmablitzkrieg on Jun 10, 2011 8:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

That commission in Texas, what's it called?

I think it’s the “Texas Licensing Department of Regulations”.

When they get another commission’s findings to review, they stamp their initials on it.

Never approach a vast undertaking with a half-vast plan.

by szquirrel on Jun 10, 2011 9:29 AM EDT reply actions  

Three time cheat… I think this would be true if he were the only one doing roids. Most everyone is doing them, Barnett is just not very good at it. The type of drug testing the UFC uses is almost completely useless, and super easy to pass if you know what to do (see Shane Carwin). Tons of fighters routinely use roids, the money is too high and the risk of getting caught is so low. Royce Gracie got popped for it even, rofl. No one talks about that though because he is likable to most.

I also think that while Barnett did ruin a great card (and to a large degree, his career) to give him a lifetime ban with no MMA rules in place about steroids is arbitrary and unfair.

I do not like Barnett but that is why I like watching him. I want to see him get his face punched in. I think that if the sport implemented concrete rules regarding steroids and ACTUAL drug testing rather than urinalysis, only then will you have compliance and a foundation for levying penalties. As it is now, the UFC is encouraging the use of steroids.

Werdum beat Fedor, Dos Santos beat Werdum, Joaquim Ferreira beat Dos Santos. Therefore Ferreira is WAAAAY better than Fedor. Keep MMA math alive!

by crizzy on Jun 10, 2011 9:55 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

No, they don't.

Stagnant and disorganized fight commissions do.

Staff Editor at GamePro
Follow Me: @KenTheGreat1
I Interviewed Dana White Once & It Was Totally Cool

by McKinley B. Noble on Jun 11, 2011 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

As it is now, the UFC is encouraging the use of steroids.

Is that why they conduct testing when they don’t have to (ie, in England) and publicize/suspend fighters for positives even though it’s not mandatory (ie, Leben)? What a ridiculous statement.

When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Editor, HeadKickLegend.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com

by Derek Suboticki on Jun 10, 2011 1:17 PM EDT reply actions  

WAR BARNETT!!!!!!!!

Stand tall Josh Barnett! After your victory I will grovel before your greatness! While you’re at it add Subo to the pile of skulls beneath your throne!

by randallhumpfreeze on Jun 17, 2011 2:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

FanPosts

Recent Posts


Managers

Strangesuspense_small Rainer Lee

Editors

Lightbulb-orange_bigger_small David Castillo

Lebowski_excited_grin_small Cory Braiterman

Authors

Princeton_shield_small Anthony Pace

Kari_sweets_2_small ElliotMatheny

Doggylets_small Chris Hall

Small Patrick Wyman

408031_10151137119550462_571520461_22348230_944591543_n_small Chad Raynard

Monocle_man_small Earl Montclair

5cyt7k_small Jack Slack