The Stagnant Career of Donald Cerrone
In his 17 fight career, Donald Cerrone has only lost three times, with one no contest. During this time, he has racked up a total of six Fight of the Nights between his time in the WEC and UFC. Two of these honors have come during his three most recent fights, all of which ended in victories for "The Cowboy". So, with all of these accolades, why does it seem like Donald Cerrone’s career isn’t going anywhere?
It all starts with Cerrone’s performances inside of the octagon. At first glance, one may look at The Cowboy’s 14-3 record with three straight victories and see a fighter at or close to the top of his division. But upon closer inspection, we see someone with the definition of a "padded record". In fact, almost every time Cerrone has been handed a chance to truly further his career as a mixed martial artist, he has disappointed. In his first fight for a major promotion at WEC 30, The Cowboy had a submission victory overturned because he tested positive for an illegal substance (hydrochlorothiazide, a diuretic). He turned things to around to earn a shot at Jamie Varner’s title at WEC 38, only to blow his chance by delivering an illegal knee in the fifth round to lose the fight by a technical split decision. Less than one year later, Cerrone found himself once again fighting for a title, but this time lost out on the Interim WEC Lightweight Championship at the hands of Ben Henderson. He was granted a rematch at WEC 48, where he once again lost to Henderson, this time by a guillotine choke in the first round.
Despite these setbacks, Cerrone has seen success during his career, but against who? While many fans may know of Danny Castillo now, he was essentially a nobody when Cerrone defeated him back at WEC 34. The same goes for Anthony Njokuani, who lost to The Cowboy back in early 2007. In fact, besides these two, none of the fighters that Cerrone has defeated in his entire career still fight under the Zuffa banner. I will say that his victories against Rob McCullough, Jamie Varner and Paul Kelly (given the short notice and big stage) were of significance, but three out of 18 fights is not an impressive figure. While some fighters make a habit of fighting the "Who’s who" of their division, Cerrone for the most part has only fought the "Who?"
Donald Cerrone’s troubles don’t stop inside of the octagon. Actually, it may be his outside of the ring antics that have cost him even more throughout his career. Often the cause of the problems start at Cowboy’s mouth, where he always seems to be producing some unwanted soundbite. The most famous of these occurred during his rivalry with Jamie Varner, where Cerrone has called Varner a homophobic slur as well as hoped that he suffers the "first death in MMA". More recently, Cerrone has found himself in the middle of a war of words with UFC fighter Cole Miller after calling him out on multiple occasions. Even in the lead up to this weekend’s UFC 131, Cerrone has made headlines by calling Mac Danzig (whom he was supposed to fight) a "p***y".
While for the most part his words are relatively harmless, Cerrone’s attitude has lead to escalated confrontations as well. At UFC 100, Cerrone and fellow teammate Leonard Garcia allegedly confronted Jamie Varner in the locker room. Upset about Varner delaying their rematch (due to an injury), Cerrone supposedly said some things to Varner that aren’t fit to be printed, which nearly lead to blows before the two could be separated. As is a common theme throughout Donald Cerrone’s career, he did not learn from past mistakes and was involved in another locker room scuffle last year. Weeks before his fight at WEC 53, Cerrone allegedly got into a fist fight with Heavyweight Marcus Sursa in the locker room of a small fight in New Mexico. Both of these altercations not only threatened Cerrone’s immediate future in terms of getting injured before his next fight, but could have cost him his career in the WEC/UFC.
While Donald Cerrone certainly isn’t the first "bad boy" in the world of combat sports, most of the others have better proven their worth. Cowboy is a handful, and to date he hasn’t really shown why he has earned the right to be. Sure, he has won multiple Fight of the Night honors, but usually at the expense of much less experienced or prestigious opponents. And that’s fine as there’s nothing wrong with entertaining albeit insignificant fights, as long as people recognize it and do not try to portray Cerrone as a top Lightweight. Until he fights and defeats someone of importance, Donald Cerrone is nothing more than a headcase who is trying to climb out of the middle of his division.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I will respond.
Although, jeez, man, he called his opponent a pussy leading up to the fight? When his opponent had called him nothing more than a gimmick? I mean, how do I defend that?
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are in a confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift
Editor, HeadKickLegend.com
Still Subo at Fightlinker.com
by Derek Suboticki on Jun 10, 2011 1:19 PM EDT reply actions
These are all solid wins.
Paul Kelly
Chris Horodecki
Jamie Varner
Ed Ratcliff
Rob McCullough
James Krause
Rob McCullough
Danny Castillo
Anthony Njokuani
Nate Mohr
Learn JiuJitsu, it's fun.
Hey, hey what can I do?---I got a little woman and she won't be true.
This street goes both ways
While many fans may know of Danny Castillo now, he was essentially a nobody when Cerrone defeated him back at WEC 34. The same goes for Anthony Njokuani, who lost to The Cowboy back in early 2007.
Cerrone was still green too.
Learn JiuJitsu, it's fun.
Hey, hey what can I do?---I got a little woman and she won't be true.
Wow I can’t remember the last time someone tried to take a machette to a guys career like you just did, what did Cerrone steal your girl or something?.
Seriously if you want to breakdown his career let’s not leave out important facts like his 2 very controversial title losses to Varner and Henderson in the WEC. Varner imo basically quit in the last round after the knee because he knew he was done and Cerrone was smelling blood. And Cerrone won that fight with Henderson and was jobbed out of the decision, while I was very hard on him in the rematch he’s rebounded very well since. Cerrone is an incredible skilled LW and if someone who’ll fight anyone at anytime he’s not ducking anyone at 155.
You forgot that he constantly hits dudes in the nuts, the "surges late in the fight" as "his opponent fades from the pressure"
but I guess that’s too far for a serious article to push. It’s worth mentioning though.
"Someone is WRONG on the internet. What do you want me to do? LEAVE? Then they'll keep being wrong!"
-Randall Munroe
Yeah and I guess...
… his 28-0 MT record doesn’t prove any worth either. Did you take into consideration that he’s fought more frequently and just as often as any fighter can in high level MMA? He doesn’t take 6 or 8 months off to decide who to fight next. Since June 2008, he’s fought on average of 3.2 months and in that time period he’s 8-3 with two of those losses as Fight of the Night honors and ALL three were for titles. Oh and all his FOTN honors came in that same time period when he’s fighting once every 3 months.
But yeah, you’re right. You should have been the matchmaker for WEC because you could have done better than to match up 2 guys who will go at it and win FOTN honors in a title fight.
Really, what more do you want from the guy? You want him to shut his mouth, then go tell him. MMA needs more vocal fighters because love him or, in your case, obviously hate him, people will know him and be more inclined to watch. Then again, James, let’s let you matchmake for a while and make sure we get ‘good boy’ fighters who say nothing and never win any Fight of the Night honors during title shots. That’s a card I can’t wait to watch.
JOKE article man!
by Caged Marketing on Jun 13, 2011 4:18 PM EDT reply actions
Where to begin...
There seems to be one piece of my article that all of you are glazing over…
In fact, besides [Njokuani and Castillo], none of the fighters that Cerrone has defeated in his entire career still fight under the Zuffa banner.
As I said, Cerrone wins and is often awarded FotN, but against who? Do you honestly believe Ed Ratcliff and James Krause are quality opponents?
As for his “controversial” losses, you can argue about judging until your blue in the face, but that won’t change his official record. He lost. He has never been a champion. I don’t care if he was “close” or “robbed”, he did not win.
Finally, for those defending his boneheaded decision making as “fun” and “intriguing”, I don’t even know how to talk to you. His past transgressions almost prevented him from fighting this weekend, as the Canadian government did not want him to enter their country. If you don’t see how him shooting off at the mouth and participating in “extracurricular” brawls is bad for his career, than you need to step away from the keyboard as to refrain from further embarrassing yourself.
Speaking of embarrassing yourself...
you’re doing a great job. It’s easy to argue one side of the coin because you don’t like the guy. But let’s look a the FACTS of the matter. Yes, you can look at the situation now and say those opponents didn’t end up where the hype was leading them to be. But only time could tell that.
Paul Kelly, current record 11-4….. record when he fought Cowboy, 11-3
Jamie Varner, current record 17-5…. record when he fought Cowboy, 16-3
Ed Ratcliff, current record 7-3…… record when he fought Cowboy, 7-1
James Krause, current record 12-3….. record when he fought Cowboy 10-0
Rob McCollugh, current record 19-7….. record when he fought Cowboy 16-4
COMBINED record at the time they fought Cowboy, 60-11.
SINCE they’ve fought Cowboy……. 6-6
So who’s to blame for their lackluster performance after they lost to Cowboy? Now we blame Donald for not fighting tougher opponents or opponents with better records? You call those guys nobodies, but he’s got a W & L with Varner. Does that make Varner both a nobody and a tougher opponent than Cowboy can handle?
You mean to tell me that at the time of the fight, those guys were nobodies and it was stupid for him to take the fight? Hell, Radcliff had only been to a decision 1x out of all his wins when he fought Cowboy. But you must be right, that guy is totally worthless and a complete walk through for Cowboy right. And then for him to win fights in spectacular fashion, ie FotN and finishing 80% of his wins by submission, well that’s just not good enough anymore.
Let’s flip this coin shall we. You’re saying he’s got a padded record and now that’s his fault. Because he’s not supposed to beat those guys who you claim are of lesser ability. This is just your personal attack on Donald because no matter what he does, you don’t like him. If he beats the guys he’s supposed to beat, then he has a padded record and isn’t going anywhere. But if he losses to them, he’s a crappy fighter.
Now look at his losses. The submission loss to Ben is obviously not good! LOL, I see that. But, with one or two minor things going his way, he would have had W over Ben in the first fight. And had he not lost due to an illegal knee, who knows how the Varner fight would have worked out. Im not in the ‘what if’ game, but he very easily could be 17-1 just as easy as he is 15-3. But you’re going to argue that he’s not 17-1 and he didn’t win those fights. Well we’ve all seen the judges make a decision in the favor of a fighter we all could clearly see lost the fight, only to give him the win. We’ve all seen doctors stop fights for something that could possibly go on. We’ve all seen refs stop fights early and seen them stop fights way to late.
That said, why do I get the feeling that even if he was 17-1, you’d still be calling him a nobody? And just so you know, I’ve never watched a fight where the judges or refs used the fighter’s personality to tip the scales one way or another. That’s YOUR personal issue with Donald that’s spilling over. How about Rashad Evans? Tito Ortiz? Brock Lesner? Those guys have bigger mouths and broadcast it to a bigger fan base than Cowboy has ever had…. yet their careers were never “stagnant” because of their mouths. It’s kind a standard in journalism to differentiate between facts and opinions and it’s always a good thing to make sure you don’t start believing your opinions are the facts.
by Caged Marketing on Jun 13, 2011 9:24 PM EDT up reply actions
If you weren’t in the what if game, you wouldn’t have played it for seven paragraphs.
Still a Beer Monster.
http://www.instrength.com
Tim can't count....
or read apparently. The only what if in that was obviously beyond your comprehension.
by Caged Marketing on Jun 13, 2011 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions
If you run a marketing company…well, I’d love to see one of your press releases. “Cerrone would be 19-0 if some bad stuff didn’t happen!”
You can make your point a whole lot coherently that a bunch of what if’s and accusations that James doesn’t like Cerrone personally.
Still a Beer Monster.
http://www.instrength.com
HAHA....
that’s funny Tim. And Im not being sarcastic, it really is funny. But I don’t write press releases.
But in all seriousness, there are 2 things in this article, Facts and opinions. If we’re going to look at the facts and form our own opinions based on those facts, then people should see ALL the facts and not just the ones that lead to James’ point.
Facts, won 5 of his last 6. More FotN honors than anyone in Zuffa, 2 of those FotN’s coming in title shots, Sherdog Fight of the Year award, Sherdog Round of the Year award….. but James is only willing to discuss facts when they back up his point. Then he gets into gray areas about Cowboy’s mouth holding him back and him being stupid for fighting outside of the cage….. Listen, I’ll be the first to say I don’t think Cowboy is a top 10 lightweight contender, hell I wouldn’t argue with people not putting him in the top 15. But calling his career stagnant because you don’t like the guy, it’s just childish. Bring facts to the table in your argument and then maybe the article would have some credibility.
by Caged Marketing on Jun 13, 2011 11:02 PM EDT up reply actions
I personally like Cowboy and think that some of the reason his career might be stagnant is bad luck with opponent injuries. But you’re not helping your case much with this stuff man.
Still a Beer Monster.
http://www.instrength.com
right and speaking about bad luck is any better than talking about his opponents records.
by Caged Marketing on Jun 13, 2011 10:14 PM EDT up reply actions
ARE YOU KIDDING!!!!.....
I just read your article about Clay Guida being a “gatekeeper” and I quote:
" Finally, they will point out a majority of Guida’s victories have come against no-names, while his only opponents of merit have defeated him."……
where you then go on to DEFEND the EXACT thing you’re arguing FOR in this article……
“A lot of these criticisms were once accurate, but what many are ignoring is that Clay Guida has drastically changed as of late. It all started in 2009, soon after Guida suffered a heart-breaking loss to Diego Sanchez in what was later selected as Fight of the Year”
So what it boils down to is your extreme dislike of Cowboy and you’re platform to just spew any kind of facts skewed to support your opinions while negligently forgetting the other side of the story.
by Caged Marketing on Jun 13, 2011 10:12 PM EDT reply actions
It's all one big conspiracy...
Yes, I wrote a positive article about Guida and a negative article about Cerrone, and it was all based on my personal feelilngs. There were no facts presented…
I mean seriously. Donald Cerrone last two victories were Paul Kelly (now fighting for UCMMA) and Vagner Rocha (Who?). Clay Guida’s last two victories were Takanori Gomi (former PRIDE champion, who granted has lost a step) and Anthony Pettis (highly touted, former WEC champion).
by James Dalgarno on Jun 13, 2011 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions
So it’s Cerrone’s fault that Paul Kelly isn’t in Zuffa…… His career is stagnant because he chose to fight someone they put in front of him and asked him to fight. Now you’re playing the “what if” Cerrone had chosen better opponents game. Cool.
Tell you what, I’ve got an article for you to write. It’s needed right away, pretty basic and pays well. But you can forget the pay day and hope for something more ‘blogger friendly’ to write about months down the road. Maybe something will come along. Your pick. But if you choose the pay day with the article I have right here for you, then you’re obviously not skilled enough to take on something more challenging that may or may not come down the road.
It’s a lose/lose for Cerrone here. There’s no point to this, regardless of the multiple people telling you otherwise.
by Caged Marketing on Jun 13, 2011 11:11 PM EDT reply actions
Wait a minute...
Some bloggers get paid? God damnit…
by James Dalgarno on Jun 13, 2011 11:15 PM EDT reply actions

by 





















