When Things Fall Apart; Manny Pacquiao
The megafight between Floyd Mayweather, Jr. and Manny Pacquiao has gone through a lot of ups and downs, with there being a lot of money on the table, almost too much, and both men's pride on the line. When Mayweather asked Manny to submit to more rigid drug testing was when things fell completely apart. Is it a matter of pride for Manny Pacquiao, who believes submitting to such drug tests an insult, or is he dodging being marked as a cheater and all of his career accomplishments ignored? Tommy Hackett looks at some of Manny's motivations, and why in the end we can still only blame Manny for this megafight not happening.
In fact, according to media reports like this one from Robbie Panglinan, Pacquiao was estranged from his father throughout his career. Rosalio Pacquiao in fact attended one of his son’s fights for the first time last year. He cannot claim credit a similar credit for Manny’s development — and neither can the world of amatuer and Olympic boxing. Its tight reign on a fighter’s weight management, its strict drug testing, and its sometimes puzzling scoring are all probably as foreign to Pacquiao as they are to many of his fans, who are reacting with horror to Mayweather’s demand, admittedly unprecedented, for Olympic style drug testing in a pro bout. But I see it differently. It’s the right thing to do. Perhaps its unfair to expect Pacquiao to step out of his comfort zone, shed a tablespoon of blood, and take the tests as Mayweather demands — giving boxing fans what we want. But life isn’t always fair, and that shouldn’t keep you from doing the right thing. It’s hard to imagine, given his upbringings, that Manny Pacquiao hasn’t already learned that.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
contradiction
“But life isn’t always fair, and that shouldn’t keep you from doing the right thing”
This is the biggest contradiction. The idea for the testing was so the fight could be on a “level playing field”. The quote would suggest the in order for Pac to do “the right thing” and make the fight fair, he’d have to submit to unfair demands?
Now what the hell is right about that?
Wouldn’t it be more fair for Mayweather to drop the demands, given they are unprecedented and have no basis? Wouldn’t that be the fairest scenario in order to give the fans the fight they want to see?
If it’s unfair to Mayweather, then I issue him the above quote…
Pacquiao was estranged from his father throughout his career. Rosalio Pacquiao in fact attended one of his son’s fights for the first time last year. He cannot claim credit a similar credit for Manny’s development — and neither can the world of amatuer and Olympic boxing.
I fail to see how Manny being estranged from his father had anything to do with the issue at hand, other than to be used as a segue into the whole “Manny never participated in the Olympics so he doesn’t understand the reasoning behind the blood testing” argument. Which is a bullshit argument and makes me think they threw the estrangement anecdote in to somehow tarnish Paquaio’s reputation.
All Olympic athletes have to undergo that type of testing, not just boxers. It is ridiculous to insist that Olympic style testing be done in a non-Olympic setting. If the athletic commission doesn’t see a reason to blood test then there is no reason to blood test. Manny hasn’t failed a urinalysis as far as I know, so subjecting him to this sort of treatment is ridiculous and uncalled for and the blame should rest solely on Mayweather’s shoulders.
Well
He was trying to make the point that fighters like Cotto and Mayweather were part of a fighting family and Manny has kind of always done it on his own, without really worrying about rules and so forth.
I agree that this fight probably didn’t need Olympic level testing and that both dudes kinda canned this fight.
Head Kick Legend
Twitter @HeadKickLegend
Note
From what I understand, Mayweather team has been insisting on Olympic style drug tests since the beginning of the negotiation process. It would be interesting to a list of all the negotiating points that was argued over from the purse split, glove type to the drug test. Who issued what negotiated point and what was conceded.
Happy Holidays and A Happy New Year
A few responses...
First, a word of thanks to Dave for posting a link to my article, and to everyone who offered feedback.
I of course disagree with the idea that “if the athletic commission doesn’t see a reason to blood test then there is no reason to blood test.” It’s completely false that there’s no basis for developing more stringent testing. As I mentioned many items go undetected from urinalysis, like blood doping and HGH. That’s why this kind of testing should be mandatory across the board. The article links several sources which I think you’ll find interesting.
In addition, my passing mention of Manny’s father is more clear if you read it in the context of the article — I actually give Manny some well deserved props for a classy statement about the death of Don Miguel Cotto which leads to the anecdote. I hope you take another look at it, Ex.
by Tommy Hackett on Jan 11, 2010 4:08 PM EST up reply actions
Sorry for being so abrasive, but I cannot stand unsubstantiated steroid allegations. As far as I know Paquiao has never failed a urinalysis, so there is no need for a blood test. If the Mayweather camp is really so worried about the harm steroids are doing for the sport, instead of exploiting any chance they can to tarnish Manny’s legacy and get into his head pre-fight, they should take it up with the AC. If the Mayweather camp wants to make allegations about Manny’s steroid use, the burden of proof is on them, not the other way around. Until it has been proven Manny takes steroids a blood test is redundant and unnecessary.
I didn’t read your article and don’t plan to, but I will take back everything negative I said about it seeing as how I didn’t understand the context. My apologies.

by 



















